OAS logo
Library Digitization Homepage
OAS Homepage
Volume 72—1992

{Page 21}

An Ecological Investigation of the Ichthyofauna of the North Canadian River in Oklahoma: 1976®1989

Jimmie Pigg, Mark S. Coleman, and Judy Duncan
State Environmental Services, Oklahoma State Department of Health, Oklahoma City, OK 73152.
Received: 1991 Nov 01; Revised: 1992 June 01

We made 287 fish collections from 37 sites in the North Canadian River drainage in Oklahoma between 1976 and 1989. Despite extensive cultural alterations of the river, it supports a diverse fish fauna. Fifty-six species were collected. Species composition, abundance, temporal and spatial patterns, and diversity of the fish communities were determined at ten stations. Alterations of these community parameters were most pronounced in areas of urbanization and dewatering, above and below impoundments, in areas of agricultural changes, riparian disturbance, floodplain erosion, changing flow regimes and industrial and municipal sewage treatment plants. Comparisons were made with the fish communities in the Cimarron River, a large river, in central Oklahoma, that is less affected by urbanization.


Introduction Description of the North Canadian River Methods Results and Discussion References Top of Page Table of Contents Home

In 1975, the Oklahoma State Department of Health (OSDH) initiated long-term surveys of fishes in each major river in Oklahoma. This paper summarizes surveys made between 1976 and 1989 on the North Canadian River and compares the results with those of a similar study of the Cimarron River (1). The native fishes of these streams appear tolerant to physicochemical stress as a result of adaptation to the relatively harsh prairie-stream environment. Such fishes may be more tolerant of human activities (e.g., urbanization) than other species (2,3).


The river has a total drainage area of 39,399 km2. It flows through a long, narrow basin as it traverses the 1,219 km from its source to the mouth. Approximately 61% of the drainage is in Oklahoma, 33% in Texas, and 6% in New Mexico (Fig. 1).

There are six major reservoirs (county, year of dam closure) in the North Canadian drainage: four on the mainstream of the river, Lake Optima (Texas Co., 1966), Canton Lake (Blaine Co., 1948), Lake Overholser (Oklahoma Co., 1919), and Lake Eufaula (McIntosh Co., 1964) and two reservoirs on tributaries of the river, Fort Supply Lake on Wolf Creek (Woodward Co. 1938), and Lake Hefner on Buff Creek (Oklahoma Co., 1947). Lake Hefner is connected to Lake Overholser by the Buff Creek Canal. Additional impoundments include municipal lakes (El Reno, Shawnee Numbers One and Two, Sportsman, Wewoka, Cohee, and Wetumka lakes), 149 small (<16,500 acre feet) Soil Conservation Service lakes, 585 playa lakes in the Oklahoma Panhandle, and six small oxbow lakes in the floodplain of the river.

Environmental Influences

Environmental factors that could influence fish communities of the North Canadian River include nutrient loading from 64 municipal sewage treatment plants with potential daily discharges of 123.8 million gallons per day (mgd) (OSDH, unpublished data). The river between Lake Overholser and Lake Eufaula was rated as the most nutrient-enriched stream in Oklahoma (5). More nutrients are added from urban and farmland storm run-off from yards, field crops, feed lots, and pasture land. There are 34 discharges into the river from industries and two discharges from electrical power plants.

We tabulated 67 man-induced factors that could affect the native fish communities (Table 1). Other factors observed during our study were urbanization, impoundments, droughts, storm run-off waters (urban and agricultural), oil field pollution, and increases of flows from sewage treatment plants.

{Page 22}

Water Quality

Several tributaries in central Oklahoma contributed contaminants to the river. Crooked Oak Creek has had brine releases and oil spills, which enter the river in Oklahoma County. There were three fish kills in Crooked Creek during the study (OSDH, unpublished data). Soldier Creek flows through Tinker Air Force Base, a major aircraft maintenance center that releases industrial wastewaters. In the past this facility discharged wastewaters high in chromium and organic solvents (3). The wastewater enters Crutcho Creek, which flows through highly urbanized Midwest City. It then receives discharges from a secondary sewage treatment plant and drainage from urban storm run-off waters from automobile sale lots and parking lots. Small tributaries such as Lightning, Lime, Brock, and Cherry creeks contribute contaminants during storm run-off from urban areas.

Water of the North Canadian above Hardesty and from Coldwater, Clear, and Kiowa Creeks and other tributaries contained low levels of dissolved minerals (< 400 mg/1). The water in this section is of the calcium carbonate type and is typical of that draining the Ogallala Formation. The North Canadian River above Palo Duro Creek cuts into the Cloud Chief formation and the concentration of dissolved solids exceeded 2,000 mg/1 at Beaver, being high in salt and gypsum levels (6).

The water below Oklahoma City (Sites 8 and 9) was also highly mineralized (chloride > 1,420 mg/1). The source of the salt was soluble materials in the mantle rocks upstream and brines from the oil industry. Other organic wastes, such as oil and sewage, were also discharged into the river. These organic and nutrient-laden waters created low levels of dissolved oxygen (<2.0 mg/1), high levels of chlorophyll and eutrophication of the river (Table 2). Throughout this section there has been salt brine seepage from waste pits, defective well casings, and water-flooding operations since 1928.

There were elevated concentrations of metal ions in the water, sediments, and fish tissues during this study. Metals contaminated the river by storm run-off events, salt brine seepage from oil field discharges, discharges from sewage treatment plants, and industrial dischargers; extensive urban and agricultural storm run-off waters contributed to elevated levels of pesticides in the water, sediment, and fish tissues (OSDH, unpublished data).

{Page 23}


Introduction Description of the North Canadian River Methods Results and Discussion References Top of Page Table of Contents Home

Between 1976 and 1989 we made 287 fish collections from 37 sites in the North Canadian drainage (Table 3). Fishes at ten sites in the North Canadian River (Fig. 1) were collected from May 1976 through November 1989. Fish communities were sampled two or three times a year for 4 to 13 year intervals, while other sites were sampled more erratically.

At each site a 200-m reach of stream was sampled with a 3.3 1.3-m heavily-leaded seine with 3.0-mm mesh during each visit. All seining trips were supervised by one of us (J.P.). The sampling technique consisted of slow downstream seining from the upstream boundary of the sample area, as close to shore and cover as possible. This method under-samples certain open water or deep channel species. During each site visit, we tried to make 20 seine hauls of 10 m length, covering the same amount of surface area and the same segment of the shoreline. About one h of effort was made at each site. In addition to seining, a 33-m, 1.6 2.5-cm mesh, monofilament gill net was placed across the site for two h.

During each visit, dissolved oxygen (DO) was measured with an oxygen meter (YSI Model 54A). Water and air temperature, Secchi disk readings, and rate of flow were recorded. A sample of water (a one-liter bottle) was placed on ice for laboratory determination of pH, turbidity, and specific conductance. Information on fish, fish habitat, environmental factors, and major changes occurring at each site, along with

{Page 24}

weather information, were recorded in a field notebook. Further, several 35-mm color photographs were made; the slides permanently record conditions at that visit.

All fish taken were preserved in 10% formalin in the field and transported to the OSDH Environmental Health Services Laboratory in Oklahoma City. Larger fish collected by gill nets were weighed, measured (total length), and identified in the field. These fish were then wrapped in aluminum foil, placed on ice, and transported to the OSDH for analysis for heavy metals and pesticides.

In the laboratory, fish in each collection were sorted and identified to species. Maximum and minimum lengths and weight (biomass) for each species were recorded. Standard length, total biomass, densities (fish/m2), biomass densities (g/m2), species diversities (based on both numbers of individuals per species and biomass, and a modification (1) of Karr's (7) index of community well-being) were calculated for each collection.

Species diversity <d> was calculated from both numerical and biomass data with the Shannon-Weaver equation as used by Wilhm (8):

<d> = i =1-Ss (ni / n) log2(ni / n)

where ni is the number or biomass of individuals in the i th species, n is the total number of individuals or biomass and s is the total number of species.

Diversity was computed for each collection from each sampling site. The individual diversities were used to calculate the mean annual numerical or biomass diversity for a specific site in a given year and the mean numerical diversity (MND) for a specific site over the sampling period. All specimens were placed in 40:60 2-propanol:water for permanent storage at the Oklahoma State University Collection of Vertebrates. All field notes, photographic slides, and other collection information are available from OSDH, Oklahoma City.

{Page 25}


Introduction Description of the North Canadian River Methods Results and Discussion References Top of Page Table of Contents Home

Our collections included 13 families, 56 species, and 301,456 specimens from 10 mainstream sampling sites of the North Canadian River (Table 4). Ten collections from four tributaries and two river sites not included in the long-term sampling included eight families, 25 species, and 11,199 specimens (Table 4). We collected 41 species and 18,056 specimens from 36 trips to seven reservoirs and one pond (Table 4). All except two of these species (Notropis volucellus and Hiodon alosoides) were also taken from the river or its tributaries.

Species Distribution

Twenty-two species were widely distributed in the mainstream of the river (Table 5). Eleven species were collected only in the river below Lake Eufaula. Four species tended to be more abundant at downstream sites and were collected from the river between Site 7 at El Reno and above Lake Eufaula. One species, the yellow bullhead (Ictalurus natalis), was more abundant at upstream sites. A similar trend was noted for this species in our Cimarron River study (1). Two species (Platygobio gracilis and Catostomus commersoni) were collected only in the headwaters above Lake Optima.

{Page 26}

We ranked 22 of the 61 species as very rare in abundance (Table 5). This ranking indicates that these species occurred in very small numbers; usually less than 19 specimens were collected. In the Cimarron River we listed 13 of 48 species as very rare.

Number of Species

Urbanization, impoundments, poor water quality, and fairly uniform fish habitat helped to restrict to 56 the number of species we collected in the North Canadian River. In comparison we found 61 species in the Cimarron River (1). On the Illinois River, we listed over 100 species (9). In other similar studies we listed 101 species in the Muddy Boggy River (10) and 98 species from the Kiamichi River (11).

In many riverine fish faunas there is a downstream trend toward increasing numbers of species. The North Canadian River shows a similar trend except for a small decrease at Site 5, which may indicate environmental stress. Despite the highly urbanized nature of Sites 8 and 9 the number of species continued to increase downstream (Table 4). This number increased from the Western High Plains (24 species) to the Western Tablelands (37 species) and Central Great Plains (44 species) and then remained about the same in the more eastern ecoregions (42-45 species).

To compare the total number of species for small tributaries in non-urbanized areas with those of small tributaries in urbanized areas, we used our collections from Cirrumpa, Kiowa, Palo Duro, and Hackberry creeks in Cimarron, Texas, and Beaver counties. These tributaries showed no effects of urbanization. We compared those tributaries with Crutcho, Cherry, and Soldier creeks in Oklahoma County, which are in urbanized areas (3). The urbanized

{Page 27}

streams had slightly smaller numbers of species (17 versus 20 species).

The total species count varied substantially in reservoirs, partly as a result of reservoir size (7 species in Hefner Duck Pond to 32 species in Lake Canton). The urbanized lakes (Overholser, Hefner, and Shawnee # 2) in central Oklahoma had smaller numbers of species (15-20 species) than the remaining lakes included in our survey, all of which were less urbanized.

Species Diversity

Sites 3 and 4 had the highest mean numerical diversities (ND = 1.77 and 1.79). Site 7, a very uniform habitat, and Site 9, an altered site, had lowest mean numerical diversities (0.82 and 0.97) (Table 6). Sites 7 and 9 were dominated by one or two species (Cyprinella lutrensis and Gambusia affinis).

The largest mean ND, 1.79, occurred at Site 4. Sites 3 and 5 also had large mean ND values of 1.77 and 1.70, respectively. The input of a high quantity of water from Wolf Creek, year-round flows, and a diverse aquatic habitat may have contributed to fairly high mean ND values at these sites (Table 6). The smallest mean ND was at Site 7, where a uniform aquatic habitat coupled with long periods of rapid flows resulted in a value of 0.82 for the study period. Mean ND values from the upstream Sites 1 through 5 ranged from 1.44 to 1.79 (Table 6), while lower values occurred in downstream areas (0.82 – 1.15).

{Page 28}

The maximum biomass diversity (BD) of 2.98 was recorded at Site 5 (Table 7). The largest mean BD, 1.89, occurred at Site 4. The smallest mean BD (1.07) was at Site 8 in the urbanized area. The widest range of BD was at Site 2 and 10 (0.00 – 2.66). The smallest range occurred at Site 4 (1.28 – 2.86).

The mean numerical diversity and the mean biomass diversity for each of the four ecoregions differed insubstantially from each other (0.02 – 0.29).

{Page 29}

Mean Biomass

The mean biomass per collection (MBM) increased from the headwaters to Site 8 (0.9®2.8 kg) (Table 7). The MBM by ecoregions showed an overall increase downstream, from the Western Tablelands ecoregion to the Central Oklahoma Texas Plains ecoregion (Table 8).

The ten sampling sites showed considerable variation in MBM, but no long term trends were noted. The middle four sites showed the greatest variation, with a range of averages from 0.5 kg at Site 5 to 2.8 kg at Site 8. At the three westernmost sites the MBM was the same (0.9 kg) and had the smallest variation (0.0) between sites. The smallest MBM was 0.5 kg at Site 5.

The maximum biomass per collection was 15.4 kg and occurred on May 18, 1984 when 26 river carpsuckers and seven carp were collected near Harrah at Site 8. The minimum biomass of less then 0.1 kg per collection occurred at Sites 7, 8, and 10. A substantial increase in MBM from Site 1 to Site 8 (0.9 to 16.3 g), appeared to support a longitudinal trend of the MBM downstream. This was expected, since in rivers there are heavier fish in the deeper downstream areas of the river. However, in the urbanized altered sites of the river (Sites 7–9) there was greater fluctuation in the MBM (0.1 – 300.2 g/specimen) (Table 8).

Fish Community Rating Index

The fish community rating index (FCRI) varied from a minimum of 88 (good) at Site 10 to 250 (no fish) at Sites 1 through 3 and 10. All sites rated by FCRI had an occasional "poor" rating (174–202). Most of the time the FCRI was in the "fair" range (123–173) except at Site 10, which sometimes received a "good" rating (74–122).

The mean FCRI for all sites except Site 1 indicated a "fair" fish community throughout the river. At Site 1 the mean FCRI was 175 (poor). The "poor" rating was the result of low flows most of the year, due to the lack of discharges from Lake Optima, and a fairly poor habitat for fish. In the urbanized area the mean FCRI declined slightly to 165 at Site 8 and 164 at Site 9. The best mean FCRI was 146 at Site 10 below Lake Eufaula.

The mean FCRI for the three westernmost ecoregions was very similar, ranging from 156 in the Central Great Plains ecoregion to 170 in the Western Tableland ecoregion. The mean FCRI of the Arkansas Valley ecoregion improved to 148. This trend in FCRI was expected since the size of the river increased and there were more diverse fish habitats available. The mean FCRI for the ten sampling sites was 161 ("fair" fish community). In comparison, the FCRI for the Cimarron River was "poor" for all upstream sites and was "fair" for downstream sites. The longitudinal trend in the Cimarron River was very similar to that in the North Canadian River.

{Page 30}

The greatest variation in the FCRI occurred at Site 10, where values ranged from 88 (good) to 250 (no fish). This variability May have been due to sudden changes in the daily water levels below Lake Eufaula. At Site 8, altered by urbanization upstream, the FCRI range was from 129 to 197 (fair–poor). Cimarron River was "poor" for all sites upstream from Site 5 and was "fair" for downstream sites. This trend in the Cimarron River was very similar to that in the North Canadian River in the downstream trend.

Faunal Composition

The omnivorous minnows Notropis stramineus and Pimephales promelas occurred in fairly large numbers and made up large percentages (16% to 29%) of all fish at Sites 1 through 5 (Table 9). At the down stream Sites 6 to 10, the percentage of this group was much smaller (2% to 8%). The largest percentage of omnivorous minnows (29%) was at Site 3. By contrast, only 2% of all fish at Site 10 were omnivorous minnows. This was the smallest proportion observed from this group. The mean for all

{Page 31}

sites was 11%, which was much smaller than the 89% found in the Cimarron River (1).

In general, the numbers of insectivorous minnows as well as their percentage of the collections increased in the downstream direction. The three westernmost sites and Site 10 showed the smallest numbers and percentage of insectivorous minnows, the percentage ranging from 9% at Site 1 to 33% at Site 3. Site 10, below Lake Eufaula, had 14%. The largest percentages were at Sites 4 through 9 (Table 9). The largest percentage (86%) was at Site 7. The overall percentage of the insectivorous minnows was 52%, slightly larger than the 39% recorded in our Cimarron River study (1).

Herbivorous minnows (Campostoma anomalum) were very rare throughout the drainage, except in Cirrumpa Creek, a headwaters tributary in Cimarron County. At the ten mainstream sites C. anomalum was collected four times at sites 8-10 and in small numbers (seven total specimens). This group comprised < 1% of all fish collected. The group was rare in our Cimarron River study also but occurred in larger numbers in the main stream of the river than in the North Canadian River.

Other omnivorous fishes showed a trend similar to that of the omnivorous minnows. The largest percentages were recorded in the headwaters at Sites 1 through 4, ranging from 70% at Site 1 to 34% at Site 4. The percentages of omnivorous fishes at Sites 7 through 10 were very similar to each other, ranging from 3% to 10%. In the Western Tableland ecoregion this group of fishes comprised 65% of the total fish. There was a decline to 20% in the Central Great Plains ecoregion and 6% in the urbanized sections (Central Oklahoma and Texas Plains) and the Arkansas Valley ecoregion (Table 9).

The insectivorous fishes showed a well-defined increase in the percentage of fish collected downstream. Insectivorous fishes increased in percentage composition from 30% at Site 1 to 92% at Sites 7 and 8. A small decline to 89% was noted at Site 9, and 80% at Site 10. The large percentage at Sites 8 and 9 was due to the large numbers of Notropis lutrensis and Gambusia affinis collected. These species accounted for 90% of the insectivorous fish collected.

The percentage of herbivorous fishes increased slightly downstream, from 0.0% at Site 1 to 5.0% at Site 8 and 4.0 % at Site 10. A similar pattern was noted for ecoregion percentages, from <1.0% in the Western Tablelands ecoregion to 4.0% in the Arkansas Valley ecoregion. The increases downstream at Sites 5, 8, and 10 were due to the gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum). At Sites 8 and 9, the increase was due to the introduction of the blue tilapia (Tilapia aurea) from Horseshoe Lake, a cooling pool for the Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company's Horselake Electrical Generation Plant downstream from Site 8. The only other herbivorous fish was Campostoma anomalum, which occurred in small numbers at Sites 8 and 9, comprising <1% of fish collected. The herbivorous fishes were found in 2% of our collections. In our Cimarron River study the herbivorous fishes comprised 1.1% (1).

Top carnivores such as largemouth bass and longnose gar comprised less than 1% of all fish captured during the study. The top carnivores increased in numbers downstream (Table 9). Only at Site 5, where they comprised 3%, and at Site 10, where they comprised 10%, did they amount to more then 1% of the fish collected. The largest population (355 specimens) was collected at Site 10, north of Whitefield. Only at Site 1 were we unable to collect this group. Seven sites showed that less then 1% of the fish were top carnivores; nevertheless, we obtained a larger number (940 specimens) from this river than we did from the Cimarron River (158 specimens) (1).

Sport fishes increased in numbers of individuals and species in downstream sites. At Site 1 there were 13 sport fish from four species collected. The number increased to 795 sport fish and 13 species at Site 7, with small declines in numbers at Site 5 and 6. The largest number of sport fish species was 15 at Sites 8 and 10. At six sites the sport fish comprised less then 1% of fish collected. At Site 5 this group comprised 6% and at Site 10, 11%. Sport fish totaling 2,660 specimens from 15 species were collected and they made up 0.9% of the fish collected. The most numerous sport fish collected was the longear sunfish (708 specimens) and it was in 43% of the collections from the river (Table 10).

Rough fish comprised 1.6% of the fish collected (4,876 specimens). The number of

{Page 32}

rough fish taken in this river was slightly larger than the number we found in the Cimarron River (1). The largest number of rough fish (2,544 specimens) occurred in the impacted sections of the river (Sites 8 and 9). These fish usually amounted to less than 4% of the total fish collected. The most numerous rough fish was the gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum), which comprised less than 1% or 2,219 specimens. The second-most numerous rough fish was the river carpsucker, making up <1% or 1,949 specimens. Site 10 had the largest percentage of both rough fishes (7%) and sport fishes (11%).

We collected six intolerant (to changes in environmental quality) fish species from the river. The number of such species increased downstream, and varied from two at Site 1 to six at Site 10. The number was fairly stable, with two or three such species at each site, except Site 10. The percentage of intolerant fishes varied from 54% at Site 1 to less than 1% at Sites 8 and 9, the urbanized section.

The number of introduced fish taken increased from three at Site 1 to 3,075 at Site 8. At seven sites the percentage of introduced fish was less than 1%. However, at Sites 5, 8, and 10 the percentages were 17%, 5%, and 54%, respectively, of the fish collected. The largest number of introduced fish (3,075 specimens) was at Site 8 in the urbanized section of the river. Two species, Tilapia aurea (2,850 specimens) and Menida beryllina (151 specimens), comprised most of the introduced fish at Site 8. Six species of introduced fish comprised 2.1% of all fish collected.


Field work for this study was made possible by the Oklahoma State Department of Health, Environmental Health Services. Joan K. Leavitt, M.D., Rocky McElvany, and Steve Houghton provided administrative support. Robert Gibbs, Waymon Harrison, Mike Petzell, David Holcomb, Thai Pham, Randy Parham, and Phil Pigg assisted in the collection of samples. A special thanks goes to Aaron Mitchum for his help in reviewing and improving this manuscript.


Introduction Description of the North Canadian River Methods Results and Discussion References Top of Page Table of Contents Home

1.   Pigg, J., Aquatic Habitats and Fish Distribution in a Large Oklahoma River, the Cimarron, from 1976 to 1986. Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 68, 9-31 (1988).

2.   Matthews, W. J. Physicochemical Tolerance and Selectivity of Stream Fishes as Related to Their Geographic Ranges and Local Distribution. In Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes (W. J. Matthews and D.C. Heins, Eds.), Univ. Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK (1987), pp. 111-120.

3.   Matthews, W. J. and Gelwick, F. P., Fishes of Crutcho Creek and the North Canadian River in Central Oklahoma: Effects of Urbanization. Southwest Nat. 35, 403-410 (1990).

4.   Omernik, J. M., Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geograph. 77, 118-125 (1987).

5.   Okla. Dept. Pollution Control. Surface Water Quality Assessment for Oklahoma. Okla FY 84 305(b) Report, pp 1075, Oklahoma City, OK (1984).

6.   Okla. Water Resource Board. Appraisal of the Water and Related Land Resources. Region Eight. Publication 34, Oklahoma City, OK.

7.   Karr, J. R., Assessment of Biotic Integrity Using Fish Communities. Fisheries, No. 6, 21-27 (1981).

8.   Wilhm, J., Species Diversity of Fish Populations in Oklahoma Reservoirs. Ann. Okla Acad. Sci. No. 5: 29-46 (1976).

9.   Oklahoma State Department of Health, Water Quality Survey of the Illinois River and Tenkiller Reservoir, June 1976 - October 1977, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (1978).

10.   Pigg, J., A Survey of the Fishes of the Muddy Boggy River in South Central Oklahoma. Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 57, 68-82 (1977).

11.   Pigg, J., and Hill, L. R., Fishes of the Kiamichi River, Oklahoma. Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 54, 121-130 (1974).

Introduction Description of the North Canadian River Methods Results and Discussion References Top of Page Table of Contents Home