
Chronicles of Oklahoma
Volume 20, No. 4
December, 1942
NOTES ON WESTERN HISTORY
By Victor Murdock
Page 372
From an admirable biography of General Bennet Riley, eminent military figure among the prairie pioneers, written by Carolyn
Thomas Foreman in The Chronicles of Oklahoma,1 I found the fact that Riley was the first man out here to make use of oxen to carry army supplies. It was a one way trip
for a great many of the beasts as it turned out, but still not all of them.
The life of the man for whom Ft. Riley (first called Camp Center) was named, Bennet Riley, contained a vivid Kansas chapter.
Born either in Maryland or Virginia, his birthplace being in doubt, in 1787, Riley, a small man physically with a hairlip
who spoke with a lisp, went into military service when very young. His valor was already known in the war of 1812. In 1813
he was on the Mississippi near Ft. Madison. In 1828 he was at Jefferson Barracks, Missouri, already with an exceptional experience
on the farthest frontiers. Once in descending the Mississippi in keel boats with their troops Captain Bennet Riley and Captain
Thomas F. Smith, visiting on deck, saw a dead tree with its roots imbedded in the river bottom. Smith said it was a sawyer.
Riley said it was a snag. The argument waged strong, Smith declaring that no man could cross him like that, ordered: "Round
the boat to, sergeant. No man shall dispute my word." The two captains went ashore and, in the presence of the enlisted men
under their command, took a shot at each other without result.
Bennet Riley was at Jefferson Barracks, a major, in 1828 when a young lieutenant, Jefferson Davis by name, arrayed in full
regimentals called at headquarters to pay his respects to the commandant. The only officer he found present was Major Riley,
"alone, seated at a table with a pack of cards before him intently occupied with a game of solitaire."
It was in 1828 that those engaged in trade from Missouri to Santa Fe petitioned the government at Washington for troop escort
on the next annual caravan. On May 4, 1829 Riley set out for Cantonment Leavenworth with his riflemen and in ten days was
there. A week or two later they had marched west to a place agreed upon as a rendevous with the traders and where Riley found
79 men with 38 wagons. Riley's soldiers were mostly foot soldiers; some were mounted on army horses; some on horses privately
owned. The oxen for the army transport Riley had requisitioned were a novelty. Reporting afterward to General Leavenworth
about the start of the expedition Riley wrote: "We had little or no trouble except with the oxen, they being of different
ages, some old and some young, and not used to being put together, and the drivers not accustomed to drive them, but after
five or six days we had no trouble."
Page 373
Riley's orders did not permit him to leave United States at Chouteau's island in the Arkansas—a point now in Western Kansas—and
go into Mexico. The very night of the day he parted with the traders they "sent an express" back to Riley for rescue from
an attack of Comanches, Kiowas and Arapahoes. As has been often told in the stories of the early West, Riley went quickly
across the Arkansas River from Kansas into Mexico and sent the caravan on its way, returning his command back into the United
States.
Here four soldiers whose enlistments had expired decided to go back to "settlement." Riley warned against this. But the men
started. Three of them were soon back into camp to report the killing of one of their number. In the attempt of the troops
to recover this man's body battles between the troops and the Indians were brought on, a frontier episode which has been frequently
described. At one point of the conflict the number of Indians was given at 300. These were mounted and armed with guns, bows
and spears. Riley in his brush with them when they menaced his camp had a force of one hundred and thirty or forty. His cattle
and horses had taken fright at the first onset, but a portion of them had been stopped by the company in the rear. At the
end of this clash Riley counted the enemy loss of eight killed and one wounded, adding: "Our loss one man wounded, who died
a few hours after, fifty-four oxen, ten public horses, ten private horses and a few public mules."
It does not appear why the loss of the oxen was so heavy. Not so long before, over on the Mexican side, Riley had found it
necessary to have the oxen unyoked and herded in good grass and later, on the American side, he had to encamp a spell to give
the cattle a chance to regain strength and spirits "there being good grass and wood there." I do not find in the report how
many oxen Bennet Riley had actually when he got back to Leavenworth on November 8 which he had sent out from the previous
June 3, but in 1853 at the close of his valiant career (it included a Mexican war chapter and a California chapter), Bennet
Riley occasionally must have remembered with gratification that he had brought beasts enough back to the Missouri River to
prove the entire feasibility of his frontier experiment in making a martial place for the docile ox.2
Reading an article in The Chronicles of Oklahoma,3 I found myself, through an article by Ralph H. Records of Norman, confronted with a pioneer figure curiously much faded long
since from my memory. This was the figure of the Texas cattle trail cowboy once so familiar in Wichita. Through the years
the original cowboy figure, in pictorial presentation, passed away largely through changes in attire. I do not know what part
commercial dramatization of
Page 374
the cowboy, in romance, whether in book, in film or on the stage, played in this evolution in dress. It must have had some
part. The first cowboys I saw here in Wichita, so far as numerous and varying individuals could be reduced to a type, had
only two bits of color about him (1) a bright neckerchief (2) a star in a red or yellow patch of leather in the fore part
of his boot-top. The brilliant shirt of this latter day, the fancifully tooled boot-tops and the elaborately studded chaps
to become so prominent in a cowboy's theatric wardrobe were not to be seen on Wichita's streets when men from the Texas cattle
trail thronged the down-town section here with the music of their spurs on the wooden sidewalks an incessant note in the local
overture.
Perhaps the most striking of the changes in cowboy fashion from the early day was in the hat. Until I came upon a reference
to it in Mr. Record's article I did not realize how marked a change really had overcome the cow-hand's head-gear. I merely
sensed that the hat the cowboy of this generation wears was not somehow like the hat that graced the head of his ancestor.
The early-day brim was wide and given to flapping, so much so that many an old-time cowboy, in a high wind, tucked under the
brim on either side, giving his head covering a scoop-shovel effect. And the crown of the old-time hat was low, not the impressive
peaked affair which has become the vogue since.
This fact is brought out in the article mentioned in pressing extracts from a manuscript. The manuscript carries the personal
recollections of L. S. Records, a cowboy who rode the range in Oklahoma and southern Kansas from 1878 until 1884. In the early
days L. S. Records' hats had low crowns and wide brims. Ralph Records adds these other details of attire:
"From 1880 onward he wore John B. Stetson's hats. His first one was dove-colored or dark-gray and cost nine dollars. His high-heeled
boots were always the best in quality. The heels gave the rider a brace when the horse came to a sudden stop; there was no
danger of the foot going through the stirrup. He wore a soft leather belt, two-and-a-half inches wide, drab yellow in color.
A webbed cartridge-bandolier was attached to the belt. A silk handkerchief, costing a dollar, was tied around his neck. When
dust flew thick and fast it was brought up under the nose."
From the manuscript Mr. Records quotes the pioneer cowboy as saying of the cold winter of 1880-1881: "I dressed so heavy I
could lie on the ground and sleep with comfort." He wore woolen breeches and overalls outside. Fleece-lined underwear, a woolen
shirt and a knit woolen blouse further added to his protection.
Ralph Records writes:
"Of winters he wound a red, knit woolen comforter around his waist and stuffed the ends of the garment under his belt. Most
men preferred to wear this garment around the neck. His hands were protected by soft-ribbed gloves and by a pair of wool-lined
mittens over them. When adjusting anything about the saddle he removed only the mittens. The overcoat was long and heavy.
A skeleton cap with made-in eyelets covered the face. He wore only thick nickel socks, made of cotton, and arctics over his
boots."
Page 375
Anybody with experience of a blizzard on the open prairies will realize how appealing these precautions in protective clothing
were. The cowboy furnished his own clothing, as he did his saddle, bridle and blankets. The company provided the rope and
the mounts, usually four. It is interesting to note in Mr. Records' article that the length of rope preferred customarily
was fifty feet, although L. S. Records' rope was only thirty feet. He did not like the added weight of the longer rope on
his saddle.
What an interesting encounter it would be if the old-time cowboy could meet his successor; the high-heeled boots still would
show, but with a change; the silk neckerchief also would still show, but displaying a rainbow splendor now it never knew in
auld lang syne.4
Return to top
Electronic Publishing Center |
OSU Home |
Search this Site
|