
Chronicles of Oklahoma
Volume 14, No. 2
June, 1936
EARLY ADVANCEMENT AMONG THE FIVE CIVILIZED TRIBES
By Edward Davis,
Professor of American History
East Central State Teachers College, Ada, Oklahoma
Page 162
The Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek and Seminole Indians are known as the Five Civilized Tribes. According to the Commissioner
of Indian Affairs for 1932, we have 317,234 Indians in the United States. Of the above Indians, 72,634, after excluding whites
and Negroes enrolled as members of the tribes, were members of the five tribes. This shows that approximately 22.5 percent
of the Indians of the United States are members of these tribes.1 The fact that five tribes, rated as civilized, constitute such a large portion of the Indians of the United States invites
a study of the civilizing influences which raised the standard of culture of these Indians, and enabled them to maintain their
numbers while many other tribes formerly strong became miserable remnants of their former selves.
The Southern Indians were far advanced in civilization prior to the time of their first contact with the whites. Their economy
was based on agriculture, and corn constituted the chief food in their diet. In addition, they raised pumpkins, several vareities
of beans, squash, artichokes and tobacco. They utilized the wild fruits of the forest, and made oil for cooking from acorns
and hickory nuts. They fished and hunted to secure their meat and fat for cooking, while bear, deer, beaver, otter, and other
skins constituted most of the sources of their bedding, carpets, and clothing. As soon as white contacts were made with them,
they adopted many of the white customs and methods and made quick adjustments to them. This ability to adjust themselves to
competitive society was of immense benefit when the frontiersmen began to press heavily upon them.2
Four influences seemed to have predominated in the transformation of these Southern Indians. One influence was the whites
who infiltrated into the Indian country, became members of the
Page 163
tribes, intermarried with them and came to exert a large influence in Indian life and government. A second force for regeneration
was the United States government which through its Indian agents, trading stations, and protection by the United States soldiers
exerted a salutary influence on the tribes. The missionaries were a third influence which induced the Indians to accept, at
least in part, Christian ideals and customs for the more repulsive primitive Indian customs. Finally the Indians themselves
definitely accepted the white man's civilization and government in order to compete with the white civilization and combat
the pressure of the States about them.
The first white man to come in contact with the Southern Indians was De Soto in his expedition 1539-1541. The Spaniards did
not immediately follow this expedition up with further explorations of settlements. The French who settled Biloxi, Mobile,
and New Orleans had considerable contact with the Choctaws and Creeks. They incurred the enmity of the Chickasaws and were
never able to win their friendship. A French mission existed among the Choctaws for some time in the early part of the 18th
century but with little evidence of converting the Indians to Catholicism or of permanent results. Christian Priber, a French
Jesuit, was among the Cherokees from 1736 to about 1745. He seems to have taught many Bible stories to the Cherokees and laid
a foundation of knowledge that the Protestant missionaries built upon when they came to the Nation about 1800. Many French
intermarried among the Choctaws and Creeks. Greenwood LeFlore, Chief of the Choctaws at the time of removal, was the son of
a French father. Alexander McGillivray, Chief of the Creeks during Washington's administration, was the son of a French-Creek
mother.3
In the English colonies the Germans and particularly the Scotch or Scotch Irish usually occupied the frontier positions and
often served as traders in the Indian trade. Such men naturally formed marriage alliances with the Indian women and came to
reside in the Indian country. The Revolutionary war gave an
3Malone, The Chickasaw Nation, 33-35; Williams, Adair's History of the American Indians, 86n, 252, 277, 305, 379 and 481; Debo, The Rise and Fall of the Choctaw Republic, 26-29 and 38-45; Walker, Robert Sparks, Torchlights of the Cherokees, 2, and 5-6; Meserve, John Bartlett, "The McIntoshes," Chronicles of Oklahoma, X, 310-325.
Page 164
added impetus for white men to press into the Indian country. These men were often Tories and sometimes caused friction between
the Indians and the United States. They often came from families of wealth and culture. They took their slaves with them and
set up farms in the Indian country. The sons of these pioneers were educated in the States. After the Creek War 1813-1814
and Jackson's attack on the foreign traders in Florida in 1817, they supported the United States more loyally and came to
exert a wholesome influence in Indian culture and government. Their homes and farms were, whether intentional or not, models
of excellence for the Indians to copy and their home methods tended gradually to be absorbed by the Indians. The tribes, from
about 1810 until the time the removals to the west were completed, were controlled in a large measure by these mixed blood
Indians.4
The early Indian policy of the United States, strangely enough, was stated by George II, King of England, in a proclamation
of October 7, 1763. In this proclamation the Indians' right of occupancy were recognized over their hunting grounds and they
were not to be molested in that possession. Subjects of Great Britian were to remove from recognized Indian lands and to refrain
from future settlements. The right of purchase of Indian lands was reserved to the government and private parties were forbidden
to make such purchases. The right to trade with the Indians was strictly limited to persons licensed by government officials.5
The Congress under the Articles of Confederation followed the lines of the Proclamation of King George and in a Chickasaw
treaty of 1786 with the United States, certain specified lands were guaranteed to the Indians, white intruders were to be
removed therefrom, the Indians, pledged themselves to trade only with traders licensed by the United States government, and
both sides pledged themselves not to injure the innocent of the other by retaliation. The United States tirade treaties with
the Cherokees in 1785 and the Choctaws in 1786 in which like terms were made.6
The white settlers continued to press on to Indian lands and
4Pickett, Albert James, History of Alabama, II, 134-136; American State Papers, Indian Affairs, II, 278-279; Missionary Herald, May 1822, Vol. 18, p. 152.
Page 165
new treaties were soon made in which the Indians were forced to cede additional lands. A topic common to most of these treaties
of the 1790's was the insertion of clauses regulating horse stealing between whites and Indians along the frontier. The Indians
except the Choctaws had been friends of the English during the Revolutionary War. They had foraged along the frontier and
obtained a supply of livestock. They learned to conserve and propagate these horses, cattle and other livestock. These stock,
increased by many introduced by the whites, served to lift the level of the Indian life. The food supply of the Indians was
increased and horses were beginning to be used, for plowing to replace the crude hand methods of earlier days. As beneficial
as the acquisition of livestock was to the Indians, horse stealing was one of the very surest means of friction between the
white frontiersmen and the Indians. The Indian agents made strenuous attempts to repress horse stealing. Benjamin Hawkins,
the United States Agent to the Creeks, required horses offered for sale in the Creek country to be registered. Soon the conditions
improved and less and less friction arose from horse stealing.7
The Creek Treaty of August 7, 1790 pledged the Creek tribe to restore to the troops of the United States such whites or Negroes
as they might have in their possession. The treaty of June 19, 1796 added property taken from citizens of the United States
to the list. The treaty of January 8, 1821 specified that the Creeks should pay to the State of Georgia in five annual installments
the value of property taken before 1802 provided that the five payments should not exceed $250,000.00. Undoubtedly the Creeks
were held responsible for Negroes who fled through the Creek Nation and into the Seminole country. This led to much later
controversy. At the time of the Seminole removal, the Creeks and other tribes assisted the United States in despoiling them
of their Negroes. Although many of such slaves were the legitimate property of citizens of the United States, the matter became
a racket in which
7Kappler, Indian Affairs, Laws and Treaties, II, 27, 31, 24, 54; Governor Blount to Henry Knox, Secretary of War, Knoxville, May 5, 1792, American State Papers, Indian Affairs, I, 265 and 382-383; and W: C. Claibourne to Henry Dearborn, Secretary of War, April 8, 1802, Rowland, Dunbar,
Mississippi Territorial Archives, I, 405-406.
Page 166
Indians and whites participated. This matter delayed and sorely complicated the Seminole removal and advancement problem.8
The Indian agents, blacksmiths, and interpreters did fine work for a number of years inducing the Indians to use horse culture,
to raise more livestock, to change communal cultivation for individual fields, and to induce the Indian men to do a greater
portion of the work in cultivating the fields. They showed the Indians how to care for, protect, and increase their livestock.
They taught the Indians to plant and care for many varieties of fruit instead of depending on the wild fruits as they had
formerly done. In the way of home conveniences they taught the Indian men to manufacture spinning wheels, looms, and like
devices for the making of cloth in the homes. Many of these tools and articles were introduced and soon the primitive Indian
clothing gave way, almost entirely, to civilized dress.9
The traders from the Spanish territory in their trade relations with the Southern Indians were a source of much trouble to
the United States. They plied the Indians with whisky and drove hard bargains with their drunken customers. They, further,
incited the Indians to hostilities against the United States. These conditons were aggravated by the Seminoles who were in
the Spanish territory and freely harbored slaves fleeing from the adjoining states. Alexander McGillivray, Chief of the Creeks
during Washington's first administration, was in league with the traders and benefited by the trade. He played British, Spanish
and Americans off against each other and was under the pay of each. Such situations were very detrimental to our relations
with the Indian tribes.10
Congress under the Articles of Confederation had already evolved a plan that aided materially in combatting the menace of
the foreign traders. The government established trading houses with goods owned by it. These goods could be provided to the
Indians cheaper than those from Pensacola. Not only was whiskey prohibited in their trading but they cooperated in keeping
it from
8Kappler, Indian Affairs, Laws and Treaties, II, 26, 48, 196, and 204; Foreman, Advancing the Frontier 159-162; Foreman, Indian Removal, Chapters 27 and 28.
10Pickett, Alabama, II, 136-144; American State Papers, Indian Affairs, I, 458; and Foreman, Carolyn Thomas, "Alexander McGillivray, Emperor of the Creek's," Chronicles of Oklahoma, VII, 106-120.
Page 167
the Indians. Between 1795 and 1810 fourteen such stations were established with four of them among the five tribes. The Coleraine
station was first established on the St. Mary's River in Georgia in 1795. This station was moved to the Oconee in 1797 and
again to Fort Hawkins on the Okmulgee in 1806. Tellico Station was established in the Southwest Territory in 1795. A station
was founded at Fort Stephens on the Mobile River in 1802. Still another was established at Chickasaw Bluffs, now Memphis,
on the Mississippi River in Tennessee in 1802. These trading stations were well distributed and did much to break the power
of the Spanish and Britsh in these tribes. Their goods were cheaper than their competitors. They sought to cooperate with
the Indian agents in introducing plants, animals, farm tools, and home utensils among the Indians. When the system was discontinued
in 1822, it was found that the stations had been operated at a financial loss to the federal government. They should be given,
however, much credit for the forward progress of the Indians.11
These earlier treaties of the five tribes with the United States provided the tribes with blacksmiths and interpreters. The
Cherokee treaty of February 27, 1819, provided for a tract of land 12 miles square to be set aside as a school fund. The lands
were sold by the United States and the proceeds invested as Cherokee school fund. The Choctaw treaty of 1820 likewise provided
54 sections of land for sale and investment as a school fund. In 1825, the United States, in addition, made permanent a Choctaw
annuity of $6000 which they had been using for schools. Then under the treaty of September 27, 1830, provision was made for
the education of 20 Choctaw youths annually for twenty years. The Creek treaty of November 15, 1827 provided for $10,000 for
education and $5,000 for relief. The sum of $5,000 was to be spent for Creek youths at "Choctaw Academy in Kentucky," $2,000
at two schools in Creek Nation and $3,000 for mills, cards, and wheels. The Chickasaw Treaty of May 24, 1834 likewise provided
$3,000 yearly for 15 years for the education of Chickasaw youths in the states. The Cherokee treaty of December 29, 1835 set
aside $50,000 for a fund for education and care of orphans and $200,000 in addition to existing school funds for a permanent
school fund. These il-
11Rowland, Mississippi Archives, I, 416-418; Wm. H. Crawford, Secretary of War, "Report to Congress March 3, 1816," American State Papers, Indian Affairs, 11, 26-28; Hamilton, Peter, J. Colonial Mobile, 376-377.
Page 168
lustrate the beginnings of the school funds and of aid to education on the part of these tribes.12
As a forerunner of an active missionary effort among the Indians, the Moravians were the first Protestant denomination to
establish a school among these tribes. This school was opened at Spring Place, Georgia in 1801. Soon after this they established
four stations among the Chickasaws.13
The American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, a cooperative board of Presbyterian and Congregational churches,
was next in this field. The Indians had requested schools and not churches. This Board therefore placed its major emphasis
upon schools, but was mildly evangelistic from the beginning.14 The missionaries established Brainard Mission which gave the name to Missionary Ridge near present Chattanooga, Tennessee
in January 1817. The next year they established Eliott Mission on the Yalobusha River in Northern Mississippi. This station
was on the border between the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations. These institutions aimed to give the Indian chldren training
in agriculture, in mechanics, and in household arts. The missionaries worked side by side with their charges in the school
homes, shops, and farms. The younger Indians progressed rapidly and soon acquired facility in the English language and in
various arts. The adult Indians copied the clothing, houses and agriculture of the mission stations. The stations thus became,
in a sense, experiment farms for the Indian tribes.15
These first American Board stations were followed by others. In 1828 there were seven mission stations and 34 workers among
the Cherokees and nine stations and 34 workers among the Choctaws and one station among the Chickasaws.l6 This Board soon began the evangelization of the Indians. Many prominent Cherokees were converted and became members of Churches
established in that
Page 169
Nation. Evangelization was slow, at first, in the Choctaw Nation but some definite progress was made.17
The Baptist and Methodist Churches entered the field of missions to these Indians somewhat later than the Moravians, Presbyterians,
and Congregationalists. The Baptists established one school among the Creeks in 1823 and two school among the Cherokees soon
after. The Methodists had one school among the Creeks and four missionaries among the Cherokees in 1828. The active work of
these two Churches was in camp meetings and in evangelistic effort. The more prominent mixed blood Indians often allied themselves
with the Churches, and hastened the adoption of Christian ideals.18
A Baptist school of great importance in the education of these Indians was the Choctaw Academy located near Great Crossing,
Kentucky. Colonel Richard Mentor Johnson founded the school in 1825 for Choctaw boys. Colonel Johnson was a member of the
United States Senate when the school was founded and became Vice President of the United States in 1837. The first term opened
with 21 Choctaw boys and Rev. Thomas Henderson in charge. The next year more Choctaw boys attended and in addition 13 Creek
boys entered. In 1834, there were 62 Choctaw, 15 Cherokee, 8 Seminole and 14 Creek boys in attendance. A few months later
11 Chickasaw boys entered. This made a representation from each of the five tribes. The Chiefs of the tribes seem to have
picked the boys from the leading families. They went back to their tribes and became tribal or district leaders. After the
tribes were removed to the West, they ceased to patronize a school so far from their homes and it ceased operation about 1845.
It had, in the twenty years of its existence, been a tremendous influence in Indian education and training.19
The three factors treated above constitute a great source of Indian advancement. The Indians themselves tremendously furthered
the objectives of these benefactors when they began to choose the "white man's road" of their own volition. The Cherokees
met
Page 170
in 1808 with all the 7 clans present and passed an act of oblivion for past offenses and renounced future retaliation. After
this date only horse thieves might be killed without trial and a provision was made for trials for them. Regulating companies
were organized to enforce the law and punish horse thieves and murderers and to probate estates.20
The Cherokee legislation was amplified in 1810. The accidental killing of Indians was not to be punished. The murderer was
to be punished although he might be the brother of the deceased. This law as the previous one left the thief of a horse at
the mercy of the owner of the horse, and the murderer of the horse thief should not be punished.21
A very distinct step forward was made in an act of the Cherokee Council of October 24, 1820. This act organized the Cherokee
Nation into eight court districts and provided for a system of district and appellate courts and for district Councils. Each
district was to have one Judge and a Marshal. A circuit Judge was provided for each two districts. A company of light horse
police was provided to accompany judges and punish offenders. A council house was established in each district and Councils
met in the spring and fall. The act provided for the collection of debts. A ranger was created to take up stray horses and
if possible find their owners. A rigid system of permits to traders and white laborers was provided for in October of 1819.
The occupation taxes arising from the law of 1819 were used indefraying the cost of the courts.22
The Choctaws soon made some notable attempts to discard their ancient customs and adopt the white civilization. As an example,
a particularly repulsive burial custom of placing their dead on scaffolds and later removing the bones and placing them in
a bonehouse was changed about 1800 to burial with poles about the grave. They held celebrations and "pulled" or lifted the
poles out of the ground. From about 1820 to 1830 they discarded this ceremony and adopted a from of Christian burial.23
Page 171
This striving for advancement is shown in a letter written by Oboho Kulla Humma, a fulblood Choctaw District Chief, to Cyrus
Kingsbury in October 1822. The Chief explained that the previous year his district had passed laws for the prevention of infanticide,
introducing whisky, stealing hogs or cattle, or running away with another man's wife. He then made a very touching appeal
to the American Board to send missionaries to organize a school in his district. He asserted that the above laws had been
passed in order that the Indians might follow in the ways of the white man. He pleaded for schools and education to supplement
this work of legislation.24
The Northeastern District of the Choctaw Nation in October 1821, created a system of Light Horse Police. These were to have
charge of the execution of criminal laws and the collection of debts. The Light Horse apprehended criminals, tried the cases
and on conviction, executed the sentences. This system was quickly extended to other districts of the Nation. Greenwood LeFlore
became District Chief in 1824. Under his influence and that of David Folsom and Peter P. Pitchlynn, the Choctaws made great
strides in the abolition of primitive practices as witchcraft and blood revenge. Soon the Choctaws modified their district
organizations and adopted a system of tribal legislation, tribal chiefs, and a code of written laws.25
The Chickasaw movements have not been treated at very great length. An investigation of 1830 showed them to have a set of
laws which promoted peace and good order among themselves.26
The Cherokees had been among the first to accept the white standards. They still continued to advance. In 1821 Sequoyah invented
the Cherokee alphabet. In 1826, a national newspaper, the Cherokee Phoenix was founded. This paper was printed in both English
and Cherokee for the greater part of the time until about 1900. Then in July, 1827 the Cherokee Council met and formulated
a Constitution for the. tribe. This tribe now had a
Page 172
Constitution and laws very similar to that of the states about them.27
The Chickasaw, Choctaw and Cherokee tribes had adopted laws and governments patterned after the whites. The Creeks had progressed
in agriculture and made some progress in the acceptance of Christianity. The Seminoles had been so much involved in wars and
contests that they had made the least progress. This start toward civilization would probably have become greater had not
the removal problem intervened. This problem served to embitter the Indians and stay the progress. Even though the educating
influences were not given time to work out their logical conclusion a foundation for civilization had been laid that has later
proved of immeasurable worth to the tribes.
Return to top
Electronic Publishing Center |
OSU Home |
Search this Site
|